The client's asked for RAMS. What do I send?

Answer the questions about this job and print a RAMS you can attach to the reply. For sites in England and Wales. Free, no sign-up. Your document stays in this browser; the optional suggestion sends this box for processing.

The generator needs JavaScript. The questions above are exactly the questions it asks, so you can work through them on paper and nothing here is hidden from you.

What's the job?

Where is the site?
What's your trade?

This covers roofing, electrical, plumbing and heating, plastering and dry lining, painting and decorating, general building and fit-out, grounds and external cleaning, and handyman and maintenance work. It does not cover tree work, scaffold erection, demolition, asbestos removal or gas work.

Tell us what you're actually doing on this job

1500 characters left

If you press Suggest my ticks, this box is sent through our server to the model after common identifier patterns are replaced. Avoid names and site details: automated redaction is not guaranteed. Every other form field and your document stay in this browser.

optional
Which of these are you doing?
Does any of this apply?
Was the building built before 2000?

You answered 'I do not know', so this document is written as though the building may contain asbestos. That is the only safe direction, and the answer is recorded here as you gave it.

Do you have the asbestos information for this building?

What's the site like?

Who else is around
Working at height
The work itself
When and where
Who is the client?
Is more than one contractor working on this project?
Has anyone appointed you principal contractor?
Is the project scheduled to run longer than 30 working days with more than 20 workers on site at once, or to exceed 500 person days?

Who could be harmed?

Who could be harmed by this work?

We've ticked the people your site answers imply. Who else is around on this job that we wouldn't know about?

Anyone else?

Read every row before this prints

Read every row before this prints
    Risk rating
    Add a hazard of your own

      The details that go on the front

      The details that go on the front

      Nothing you've typed here has been checked by us. Insurance, accreditations, card numbers and competence are reproduced exactly as entered.

      Nothing yet
      0 of 0 rows confirmed

      Rows you've read and confirmed. This is a count of your work, not a score.

      Pick your trade and tick what you're doing, and the rows appear here.

      What HSE asks you to consider

      This panel groups controls against HSE's risk-assessment checklist. It is not HSE's ordered hierarchy of controls and does not say the groups are equally effective. HSE separately puts elimination first and PPE last.

      • A1Get rid of the hazard
          0
        • A2Redesign the job
            0
          • A3Replace the material or machine
              0
            • A4Organise the work
                0
              • A5Practical measures to work safely
                  0
                • A6PPE, and make sure it is worn
                    0

                  Work at height: HSE's hierarchy

                  HSE's words: the hierarchy must be followed systematically and only when one level is not reasonably practicable may the next level be considered. It also says it is not acceptable to start at personal fall arrest.

                  Levels with no chip have no control in our library, not a gap on your job. Nothing here hands anyone a harness, a lanyard or a net as a measure of its own. If the job needs one, that is your competent person's call, and the PPE list is where it lands.

                  • B1Avoid work at height
                      0
                    • B2A place that is already safe
                        0
                      • B3Equipment protecting everyone
                          0
                        • B4Equipment protecting one person
                            0
                          • B5Shorten the fall, everyone
                              0
                            • B6Shorten the fall, one person
                                0
                              • B7Soften the landing
                                  0
                                • B8Training, instruction, other means
                                    0

                                  This is a draft, prepared from a hazard library, for your competent person to read line by line, amend against what they know about this site, and take ownership of. It is not safety, legal or engineering advice. It does not prove compliance and it does not replace competent-person assessment, training, permits, manufacturer's instructions or the regulator's own guidance.

                                  rams-data v1.1

                                  How this RAMS is put together

                                  Every hazard row on this page comes out of a library we compiled from HSE's own guidance and from the regulations themselves, and each control carries the page or the provision it came from. Click any source chip and you can read the original. That's the whole design: the page's authority is HSE's, borrowed and attributed, and never ours.

                                  You pick your trade, and that decides which tasks you are offered. Tick the ones you're actually doing on this job. A set of questions about the site comes next, and your answers pull in the hazards a commercial job has that a domestic one does not: people in the building, children about, other trades on your heels, work above ground level, an old building. The rules that match your answers to hazards are set logic, not guesswork, and no part of the document is written by a model.

                                  Eight stacked rungs showing HSE's work at height hierarchy, from avoiding work at height at the top down to training, instruction and other means at the bottom.
                                  HSE's work at height hierarchy, in the order HSE publishes it. The page fills the rungs with the controls your own answers pulled in, and leaves the empty ones empty.

                                  Then every row arrives unconfirmed. You read it, you keep it, you edit it, or you delete it, and until you've done that to every row the print button stays shut. You also have to add at least one hazard of your own, or say plainly that there are none on this job. It's a bit of friction, in the one place where friction is the point.

                                  HSE puts it more bluntly than we would.

                                  "Do not just copy an example and put your company name to it as that would not satisfy the law and would not protect your employees. You must think about the specific hazards and controls your business needs."

                                  There is one optional step that talks to a server. If you type a description of the job and press Suggest my ticks, that description alone is sent, with names, addresses, phone numbers, postcodes and dates swapped for placeholders first, and what comes back is a list of ticks to consider, each showing the words in your own description that prompted it. Nothing it suggests goes into the document until you tap it. Everything else, from your company details and the site address to the client's name and every row of the document, is worked out in this browser and never sent anywhere.

                                  Where that box goes, in plain terms, because you shouldn't have to guess. It goes through our own server to the model that reads it. The text you sent and the answer it produced are not stored after the answer comes back. The pattern swap runs before anything leaves the browser, and it is a pattern swap, not a promise: keep names and site details out of the box, or skip it entirely and tick the lists, which is how most people use this page.

                                  What it will not do

                                  It will not tell you a job is notifiable, or that you are the principal contractor, or that your document is legally sufficient. Those are not our calls. Where a call like that would be natural, it asks you the question instead and puts it on the document, so the person who does have the answer can give it.

                                  And some work it simply will not draft. Tick licensed asbestos work, a confined space entry, live electrical working, gas work, a lifting operation that needs a plan and a competent person, demolition, scaffold erection, or an excavation someone has to climb into, and the generator stops and tells you what is actually required instead. A Word template cannot refuse, and that refusal is the most useful thing on this page.

                                  RAMS questions tradespeople actually ask

                                  What does RAMS stand for?

                                  Risk Assessment and Method Statement. It is British procurement vocabulary rather than a legal term, and it means one bundle carrying two things: the assessment of what could hurt someone on this job and what you are doing about it, and the statement of how the work will actually be carried out, step by step. The University of Sussex glosses it for its own contractors as documents that "explain how work will be carried out safely". An American would call it something else, and so would a Canadian. On a British site, it is RAMS.

                                  Are RAMS a legal requirement?

                                  Not by that name. What the law requires is the assessment. Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, every employer must make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks to their employees and to anyone else affected by what they do, and where the employer employs five or more employees, the significant findings must be recorded. The method statement is not named in that regulation at all. What makes RAMS feel compulsory is the client: Bristol will not issue a permit without job-specific RAMS attached, King's College London will not issue one until yours has been uploaded and accepted, and Sussex tells contractors outright not to start work until the documentation is in place. Not a legal duty. A commercial one, and it bites just as hard.

                                  Who can write a RAMS?

                                  You can write one if you have enough training, experience or knowledge of the work to assess it properly. There is no register of RAMS writers and no single qualification that by itself entitles someone to sign one. What the law asks for is that the assessment is suitable and sufficient, which in practice means it was done by someone who understands the work. That is usually the person doing it. The document this page produces carries the name of the competent person you nominate, and the point of the confirm-every-row step is that they have actually read it before their name goes on the front.

                                  Are a risk assessment and a method statement the same thing?

                                  No, and reviewers notice when a document confuses them. The risk assessment is a table: hazard, who might be harmed and how, what you are already doing about it, what more is needed, who is doing it and by when. The method statement is a sequence: first this, then this, with these controls in place at each step. One tells the reviewer what could go wrong. The other tells them what will actually happen on Tuesday morning.

                                  Do I need a written risk assessment if I have fewer than five employees?

                                  This is the single most-mangled fact in the subject, so read the two halves separately. The duty to assess applies whatever your size. The duty to record kicks in at five: regulation 3(6) says that where the employer employs five or more employees, they must record the significant findings and any group of employees especially at risk. Below five, regulation 3 still requires the assessment but does not itself require its significant findings to be recorded. Other duties and client requirements may still require written documents.

                                  Does a sole trader need RAMS?

                                  The five-employee recording duty above does not reach a sole trader with no employees. Construction is a prescribed undertaking for section 3(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, so a self-employed person doing this work must still conduct it so that they and other people are not exposed to risk, so far as is reasonably practicable. The client's gate is a separate point: no RAMS, no gate pass. Most sole traders arrive here because of that commercial requirement.

                                  What should a RAMS include?

                                  Sussex's own contractor guidance sets a fair bar: identify the hazards of the task, explain the control measures, describe the safe system of work, and consider the interactions with other contractors and with occupied areas. Then the header a reviewer checks before reading a word of the content: who you are, where the site is, who the client is, the dates, and who to ring. This page builds all of that, plus the plant, the substances, the PPE, the emergency arrangements, the review triggers and a sign-on sheet for the morning briefing.

                                  How often should a RAMS be reviewed?

                                  Not on a calendar. On an event. HSE's rule is to review when the controls may no longer be effective, or when something changes that could create new risks, such as staff, a process, substances or equipment, and after any accident or near miss. Our document prints a review-triggers block naming the specific changes that would invalidate this particular assessment: a different platform, an escape route moving, another trade starting in the same area, a suspect material turning up. It's the block that stops a document being valid forever.

                                  Will HSE accept this document?

                                  HSE does not routinely pre-approve RAMS, and it has not approved this tool or its output. Your client's reviewer decides whether to accept the document for the job. HSE may ask to see a risk assessment or method statement during an inspection or investigation. A tool cannot substantiate a claim that an unseen document is "HSE-approved"; what we can show is the official source supporting each control.

                                  Does this cover Scotland and Northern Ireland?

                                  Not yet, and we'd rather say that than pretend. This release is built and checked for sites in England and Wales, and the first question on the page asks where the site is so you find out in seconds rather than at the end.

                                  In Scotland, HSE is still the regulator and CDM 2015 still applies, so most of what is on this page still holds. Fire is where it stops: every fire row here is written against the England and Wales fire safety order, and Scotland has its own. We have not built that branch, so we won't print you a document that quietly cites the wrong one.

                                  Northern Ireland diverges further. The regulator is HSENI rather than HSE, the construction regulations are the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016, which took effect on 1 August 2016, and HSENI is explicit that there is "no exclusion for small projects or domestic projects". HSENI also still publishes its risk assessment guidance as five steps, where HSE's current wording for Great Britain sets out the same work under different step names. That is more than a header swap, so Northern Ireland is routed out too, and the card on the page points you at HSENI's own guidance.

                                  We are not claiming a four-nation product. We are telling you which two nations this one was actually checked against.

                                  RAMS templates, and why this is not one

                                  What a free RAMS template actually gives you

                                  Search for a RAMS template and you get a Word file. Sometimes it is behind an email form, sometimes it is bundled with a fifteen-day trial, and once you open it, it's a blank table with column headings. The headings are usually right. Everything that would take you an evening is still yours to write. HSE publishes the best of these for free and ungated, and its own worked examples cover an office, a shop, a food business, a motor vehicle repair shop, factory maintenance and a warehouse. Not one of them is a construction trade, which is where the roofer reading this gets stuck.

                                  Risk assessment and method statement: the two halves

                                  The risk assessment is the table. HSE's own recorded set is the shape of it: the hazards, who might be harmed and how, what you are already doing to control the risks, what further action is needed, who is doing it and by when. Note what is not on that list, which is a risk score. Neither of HSE's cited risk-assessment pages prescribes a matrix. The likelihood-by-severity grid every template ships is a presentational convention, and any page that describes a 5x5 matrix as a standard is describing a habit. We show a rating because your client's reviewer expects one, and we say plainly underneath it what it is.

                                  The method statement is the sequence. It is where a reviewer looks to find out whether you have thought about the order of the work: when the edge protection goes up relative to the first person on the roof, when the escape route is handed back, what happens to the water at the end of the day. HSE calls a method statement a useful way of recording the hazards involved in specific work at height tasks and communicating the risk and the precautions to everyone involved, and adds that it "need be no longer than necessary".

                                  Site-specific is the whole test

                                  The reason a downloaded template gets bounced is not that it's badly written. It's that it is about roofs in general and the reviewer is holding a job about this roof, on this school, in the second week of the summer holidays, with the caretaker still on site. Sussex asks its contractors for RAMS that are "specific to the task and location, rather than generic". That is the bar, and it is why this page asks you twenty-odd questions about the site before it will print anything, and why it will not print at all until you have looked at every row.

                                  What the client is really asking for

                                  The RAMS request rarely arrives on its own. It comes with the public liability certificate, the employers' liability certificate, the CSCS card numbers and, depending on the client, an SSIP-family accreditation like CHAS or Constructionline. On a bigger site there will be a permit to work for hot works, confined space entry or electrical work, and your RAMS gets attached to the permit application. Bristol asks for that application ten working days before the work starts. Every construction project needs a construction phase plan before the site is set up: the sole contractor prepares it on a one-contractor project, and the principal contractor on a project with more than one contractor. A client can still ask for RAMS as a separate procurement document. King's College London says its project-specific plan is supplied in place of RAMS where the contractor controls its CDM site. None of this is on the invoice, and all of it is the difference between starting on the agreed date and not.

                                  Two more things, and then we will let you get on

                                  The trades that get the commercial work are the ones a client can check before they ring. We list trades on Industry Oversight at no cost and collect no referral fee. Add the credentials you actually hold and the work you actually do, and let the next facilities manager find you before the email asking for your RAMS.

                                  Nothing here is a verification of anyone's health and safety arrangements, ours included.

                                  Your listing would sit on the page for your own trade.

                                  The other two tools we built for UK trades

                                  Same reader, same evening: what you write on the quote, and what you can charge when the client ignores the invoice.

                                  Nothing is saved here, so bookmark the page rather than the document.

                                  Sources

                                  rams-data v1.1

                                  Every control on this page cites one of these 95 pages or provisions: the regulations themselves, HSE's own guidance and publications, and the scheme pages the trade actually deals with. Each was fetched and its status, title and topic checked, and none of the links is an affiliate, referral or sponsored link.

                                  Back To Top